Global Veterinary Diagnostic Equipment Market Insights, Forecast to 2025

SKU ID : QYR- 12761373

Publishing Date : 06-Dec-2018

No. of pages : 123

PRICE
4900
9800


  • Veterinary Diagnostic Equipment are some Equipmentmedical tests required to diagnose disease or injury in animals.
    The global Veterinary Diagnostic Equipment market is valued at xx million US$ in 2017 and will reach xx million US$ by the end of 2025, growing at a CAGR of xx% during 2018-2025. The objectives of this study are to define, segment, and project the size of the Veterinary Diagnostic Equipment market based on company, product type, end user and key regions.

    This report studies the global market size of Veterinary Diagnostic Equipment in key regions like North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, Central & South America and Middle East & Africa, focuses on the consumption of Veterinary Diagnostic Equipment in these regions.
    This research report categorizes the global Veterinary Diagnostic Equipment market by top players/brands, region, type and end user. This report also studies the global Veterinary Diagnostic Equipment market status, competition landscape, market share, growth rate, future trends, market drivers, opportunities and challenges, sales channels and distributors.

    The following manufacturers are covered in this report, with sales, revenue, market share for each company:
    GE
    IDEXX
    Esaote
    Agfa Healthcare
    Toshiba
    Carestream Health
    BCF Technology
    Mindray
    Hallmarq
    Heska
    Sedecal
    Kaixin Electric
    Chison
    MinXray
    Diagnostic Imaging Systems

    Market size by Product
    X-ray
    Ultrasound
    MRI
    Others
    Market size by End User
    Livestock
    Pet

    Market size by Region
    North America
    United States
    Canada
    Mexico
    Asia-Pacific
    China
    India
    Japan
    South Korea
    Australia
    Indonesia
    Singapore
    Malaysia
    Philippines
    Thailand
    Vietnam
    Europe
    Germany
    France
    UK
    Italy
    Spain
    Russia
    Central & South America
    Brazil
    Rest of Central & South America
    Middle East & Africa
    GCC Countries
    Turkey
    Egypt
    South Africa

    The study objectives of this report are:
    To study and analyze the global Veterinary Diagnostic Equipment market size (value & volume) by company, key regions, products and end user, breakdown data from 2013 to 2017, and forecast to 2025.
    To understand the structure of Veterinary Diagnostic Equipment market by identifying its various subsegments.
    To share detailed information about the key factors influencing the growth of the market (growth potential, opportunities, drivers, industry-specific challenges and risks).
    Focuses on the key global Veterinary Diagnostic Equipment companies, to define, describe and analyze the sales volume, value, market share, market competition landscape and recent development.
    To project the value and sales volume of Veterinary Diagnostic Equipment submarkets, with respect to key regions.
    To analyze competitive developments such as expansions, agreements, new product launches, and acquisitions in the market.

    In this study, the years considered to estimate the market size of Veterinary Diagnostic Equipment are as follows:
    History Year: 2013-2017
    Base Year: 2017
    Estimated Year: 2018
    Forecast Year 2018 to 2025

    This report includes the estimation of market size for value (million US$) and volume (K Units). Both top-down and bottom-up approaches have been used to estimate and validate the market size of Veterinary Diagnostic Equipment market, to estimate the size of various other dependent submarkets in the overall market. Key players in the market have been identified through secondary research, and their market shares have been determined through primary and secondary research. All percentage shares, splits, and breakdowns have been determined using secondary sources and verified primary sources.

    For the data information by region, company, type and application, 2017 is considered as the base year. Whenever data information was unavailable for the base year, the prior year has been considered.