PART 01: Executive summary • Highlights PART 02: Scope of the report • Market overview • Top-vendor offerings PART 03: Market research methodology • Research methodology • Economic indicators PART 04: Introduction • Key market highlights PART 05: Market landscape • Market overview • Market size and forecast • Five forces analysis PART 06: Market segmentation by product • Global hemodynamic monitoring devices market by consumables • Global hemodynamic monitoring devices market by systems PART 07: Market segmentation by application • Minimally invasive hemodynamic monitoring • Invasive hemodynamic monitoring • Non-invasive hemodynamic monitoring PART 08: Market segmentation by end-user • Hospitals • Ambulatory surgical centers • Other medical facilities PART 09: Geographical segmentation • Hemodynamic monitoring devices market in Americas • Hemodynamic monitoring devices market in EMEA • Hemodynamic monitoring devices market in APAC PART 10: Market drivers • Demand in disease treatment and critical care • Reimbursement approval • Shift to minimally and non-invasive hemodynamic monitoring PART 11: Impact of drivers PART 12: Market challenges • Risks associated with invasive hemodynamic monitoring • Dominance of existing vendors • Limitation of non-invasive hemodynamic monitoring PART 13: Impact of drivers and challenges PART 14: Market trends • Remote hemodynamic monitoring • Government and private funding • Advances in technology PART 15: Vendor landscape • Competitive scenario • Market share analysis • Edwards Lifesciences • PULSION Medical Systems • LiDCO • ICU Medical • Other prominent vendors PART 16: Appendix • List of abbreviations PART 17: Explore Technavio List of Exhibits Exhibit 01: Product offerings Exhibit 02: Types of hemodynamic monitoring Exhibit 03: Global hemodynamic monitoring devices market 2015-2020 ($ millions) Exhibit 04: Five forces analysis Exhibit 05: Global hemodynamic monitoring devices market segmentation by product 2015 Exhibit 06: Global hemodynamic monitoring devices market by consumables 2015-2020 ($ millions) Exhibit 07: Global hemodynamic monitoring devices market by systems 2015-2020 ($ millions) Exhibit 08: Global hemodynamic monitoring devices market segmentation by application 2015 Exhibit 09: Global hemodynamic monitoring devices market segmentation by end-user 2015 Exhibit 10: Global hemodynamic monitoring devices market segmentation by geography 2015 Exhibit 11: Global hemodynamic monitoring devices market segmentation by geography 2020 Exhibit 12: Global hemodynamic monitoring devices market segmentation by geography 2015-2020 Exhibit 13: Global hemodynamic monitoring devices market segmentation by geography 2015-2020 ($ millions) Exhibit 14: Hemodynamic monitoring devices market in Americas 2015-2020 ($ millions) Exhibit 15: Hemodynamic monitoring devices market in EMEA 2015-2020 ($ millions) Exhibit 16: Hemodynamic monitoring devices market in APAC 2015-2020 ($ millions) Exhibit 17: Impact of drivers Exhibit 18: Impact of drivers and challenges Exhibit 19: Ranking of vendors 2015 Exhibit 20: Vendors developing different types of hemodynamic monitoring systems and consumables Exhibit 21: Edwards Lifesciences: Product portfolio Exhibit 22: Edwards Lifesciences: Revenue of critical care segment 2013-2015 ($ millions) Exhibit 23: Edwards Lifesciences: Key takeaways Exhibit 24: PULSION Medical Systems: Product portfolio Exhibit 25: PULSION Medical Systems: Key takeaways Exhibit 26: LiDCO: Product portfolio Exhibit 27: LiDCO: Sales of monitors by geography Exhibit 28: LiDCO: Key takeaways Exhibit 29: ICU Medical: Product portfolio Exhibit 30: ICU Medical: Revenue of critical care segment 2013-2015 ($ millions) Exhibit 31: ICU Medical: Key takeaways Exhibit 32: Other prominent vendors

Edwards Lifesciences Corp., ICU Medical Inc., LiDCO Ltd., PULSION Medical Systems SE, Cheetah Medical, Deltex Medical Group, FUJIFILM SonoSite, GE Healthcare, Mindray, Nihon Kohden, NImedical, Noninvasive Medical Technologies, Osypka Medical, Philips Healthcare, Schwarzer Cardiotek, Tensys Medical, Uscom.